Εμφανίζονται 7 τίτλοι με αναζήτηση: Πληροφορίες για τον τόπο για το τοπωνύμιο: "ΜΥΚΗΝΕΣ Μυκηναϊκό ανάκτορο ΑΡΓΟΛΙΔΑ".
sometimes Mycene (Mukenai; Mukene, Hom. Il. iv. 52: Eth. Mukenaios,,
Mycenaeus, Mycenensis: Kharvati). One of the most ancient towns in Greece, and
celebrated as the residence of Agamemnon. It is situated at the north-eastern
extremity of the plain of Argos upon a rugged height, which is shut in by two
commanding summits of the range of mountains which border this side of the Argeian
plain. From its retired position it is described by Homer (Od. iii. 263) as situated
in a recess (muchph) of the Argeian land, which is supposed by some modern writers
to be the origin of the name. The ancients, however, derived the name from an
eponymous heroine Mycene, daughter of Inachus, or from the word mukes, for which
various reasons were assigned. (Paus. ii. 17. § 3; Steph. B. s. v.) The position
was one of great importance. In the first place it commanded the upper part of
the great Argeian plain, which spread out under its walls towards the west and
south; and secondly the most important roads from the Corinthian gulf, the roads
from Phlius, Nemea, Cleonae. and Corinth, unite in the mountains above Mycenae,
and pass under the height upon which the city stands. It was said to have been
built by Perseus (Strab. viii. p. 377 ; Paus. ii. 15. § 4, ii. 16. § 3), and its
massive walls were believed to have been the work of the Cyclopes. Hence Euripides
calls Mycenae polisma Perseos, Kuklopion ponon cheron (Iphig. in Aul. 1500). It
was the favourite residence of the Pelopidae, and under Agamemnon was regarded
as the first city in Greece. Hence it is called poluchrusos by Homer (Il. vii.
180, xi. 46), who also gives it the epithets of euruaguia (Il. iv. 52) and euixtimenon
ptoliethron (Il. ii. 569). Its greatness belongs only to the heroic age, and it
ceased to be a place of importance after the return of the Heracleidae and the
settlement of the Dorians in Argos, which then became the first city in the plain.
Mycenae, however, maintained its independence, and sent some of its citizens to
the assistance of the Greeks against the host of Xerxes, although the Argives
kept aloof from the common cause. Eighty Mycenaeans were present at Thermopylae
(Herod. vii. 202), and 400 of their citizens and of the Tirynthians fought at
Plataeae (Herod. ix. 28). In B.C. 468, the Dorians of Argos, resolving to bring
the whole district under their sway, laid siege to Mycenae; but the massive walls
resisted all their attacks, and they were obliged to have recourse to a blockade.
Famine at length compelled the inhabitants to abandon the city; more than half
of them took refuge in Macedonia, and the remainder in Cleonae and Ceryneia. (Diod.
xi. 65; Strab. viii. pp. 372, 377; Paus. ii. 16. § 5, v. 23. § 3, vii. 25. § 3,
viii. 27. § 1.) From this time Mycenae remained uninhabited, for the Argives took
care that this strong fortress should remain desolate. Strabo, however, committed
a gross exaggeration in saying that there was not a vestige of Mycenae extant
in his time (viii. p. 372). The ruins were visited by Pausanias, who gives the
following account of them (ii. 15, 16): Returning to the pass of the Tretus, and
following the road to Argos, you have the ruins of Mycenae on the left hand. Several
parts of the enclosure remain, and among them is the gate upon which the lions
stand. These also are said to be the work of the Cyclopes, who built the walls
of Tiryns for Proetus. Among the ruins of the city there is a fountain named Perseia,
and subterraneous buildings (hupogaia oikodomemata) of Atreus and his sons, in
which their treasures were deposited. There are likewise the tombs of Atreus,
of his charioteer Eurymedon, of Electra, and a sepulchre in common of Teledamus
and Pelops, who are said to have been twin sons of Cassandra. But Clytaemnestra
and Aegisthus were buried at a little distance from the walls, being thought unworthy
of burial where Agamemnon lay.
The ruins of Mycenae are still very extensive, and, with the exception
of those of Tiryns, are more ancient than those of any other city in Greece. They
belong to a period long antecedent to all historical records, and may be regarded
as the genuine relics of the heroic age.
Mycenae consisted of an Acropolis and a lower town, each defended
by a wall. The Acropolis was situated on the summit of a steep hill, projecting
from a higher mountain behind it. The lower town lay on the south-western slope
of the hill, on either side of which runs a torrent from east to west. The Acropolis
is in form of an irregular triangle, of which the base fronts the south-west,
and the apex the east. On the southern side the cliffs are almost precipitous,
overhanging a deep gorge; but on the northern side the descent is less steep and
rugged. The summit of the hill is rather more than 1000 feet in length, and around
the edge the ruined walls of the Acropolis still exist in their entire circuit,
with the exception of a small open space above the precipitous cliff on the southern
side, which perhaps was never defended by a wall The walls are more perfect than
those of any other fortress in Greece; in some places they are 15 or 20 feet high.
They are built of the dark-coloured limestone of the surrounding mountains. Some
parts of the walls are built, like those of Tiryns, of huge blocks of stone of
irregular shape, no attempt being made to fit them into one another, and the gaps
being filled up with smaller stones. But the greater part of the walls consists
of polygonal stones, skilfully hewn and fitted to one another, and their faces
cut so as to give the masonry a smooth appearance. The walls also present, in
a few parts, a third species of masonry, in which the stones are constructed of
blocks of nearly quadrangular shape; this is the case in the approach to the Gate
of Lions. This difference in the masonry of the walls has been held to prove that
they were constructed at different ages; but more recent investigations amidst
the ruins of Greece and Italy has shown that this difference in the style of masonry
cannot be regarded as a decisive test of the comparative antiquity of walls; and
Col. Mure has justly remarked that, as there can be no reasonable doubt that the
approach to the Gate of Lions is of the same remote antiquity as the remainder
of the fabric, it would appear to have been the custom with these primitive builders
to pay a little more attention to symmetry and regularity in the more ornamental
portions of their work.
The chief gate of the Acropolis is at the NW. angle of the wall. It
stands at right angles to the adjoining wall of the fortress, and is approached
by a passage 50 feet long and 30 wide, formed by that wall and by another wall
exterior to it. The opening of the gateway widens from the top downwards; but
at least two-thirds of its height are now buried in ruins. The width at the top
of the door is 9 1/2 feet. This door was formed of two massive uprights, covered
with a third block, 15 feet long, 4 feet wide, and 6 feet 7 inches high in the
middle, but diminishing at the two ends. Above this block is a triangular gap
in the masonry of the wall, formed by an oblique approximation of the side courses
of stone, continued from each extremity of the lintel to an apex above its centre.
The vacant space is occupied by a block of stone, 10 feet high, 12 broad, and
2 thick, upon the face of which are sculptured two lions in low relief, standing
on their hind-legs, upon either side of a covered pillar, upon which they rest
their fore-feet. The column becomes broader towards the top, and is surmounted
with a capital, formed of a row of four circles, enclosed between two parallel
fillets. The heads of the animals are gone, together with the apex of the cone
that surmounted the column. The block of stone, from which the lions are sculptured,
is said by Leake and other accurate observers to be a kind of green basalt; but
this appears to be a mistake. We learn from Mure (Tour in Greece, vol. ii. p.
324) that the block is of the same palombino, or dove-coloured limestone, of which
the native rock mainly consists, and that the erroneous impression has been derived
from the colour of the polished surface, which has received from time and the
weather a blueish green hue. The column between the lions is the customary symbol
of Apollo Agyieus, the protector of doors and gates. (Muller, Dor. ii. 6. § 5.)
This is also proved by the invocation of Apollo in the Agamemnon of Aeschylus
(1078, 1083, 1271), and the Electra of Sophocles (1374), in both of which tragedies
the scene is laid in front of this gate. It has been well observed that this pair
of lions stands to the art of Greece somewhat in the same relation as the Iliad
and the Odyssey to her literature; the one, the only extant specimens of the plastic
skill of her mythical era, the other, the only genuine memorials of its chivalry
and its song. The best observers remark that the animals are in a style of art
peculiar to themselves, and that they have little or nothing of that dry linear
stiffness which characterises the earlier stages of the art of sculpture in almost
every country, and present consequently as little resemblance to the Archaic style
of the Hellenic works of a later period as to those of Egypt itself. The special
peculiarities of their execution are a certain solidity and rotundity amounting
to clumsiness in the limbs, as compared with the bodies. The hind-legs, indeed,
are more like those of elephants than lions; the thighs, especially, are of immense
bulk and thickness. This unfavourable feature, however, is compensated by much
natural ease and dignity of attitude. The turning of the body and shoulders is
admirable, combining strength with elegance in the happiest proportions. The bellies
of both are slender in comparison with the rest of the figure, especially of the
one on the right of the beholder. The muscles, sinews, and joints, though little
detailed, are indicated with much spirit. The finish, both in a mechanical and
artistical point of view, is excellent; and in passing the hand over the surface,
one is struck with the smooth and easy blending of the masses in every portion
of the figure. (Mure, vol. ii. p. 171.) Besides the great Gate of Lions, there
was a smaller gate or postern on the northern side of the Acropolis, the approach
to which was fortified in the same manner as that leading to the great gate. It
is constructed of three great stones, and is 5 feet 4 inches wide at the top.
Near the Gate of Lions the wall of the lower city may be traced, extending
from N. to S. In the lower town are four subterraneous buildings, which are evidently
the same as those described by Pausanias, in which the Atreidae deposited their
treasures. Of these the largest, called by the learned the Treasury of Atreus,
and by the Greek ciceroni the Grave of Agamemnon, is situated under the aqueduct
which now conveys the water from the stream on the northern side of the Acropolis
to the village of Kharvati. This building is in nearly a perfect state of preservation.
It is approached by a passage now in ruins, and contains two chambers. The passage
leads into a large chamber of a conical form, about 50 feet in width and 40 in
height; and in this chamber there is a doorway leading into a small interior apartment.
The doorway terminating the passage, which leads into the large, chamber, is 8
feet 6 inches wide at the top, widening a little from thence to the bottom. On
the outside before each door-post stood a semi-column, having a base and capital
not unlike the Tuscan order in profile, but enriched with a very elegant sculptured
ornament, chiefly in a zigzag form, which was continued in vertical compartments
over the whole shaft. Those ornaments have not the smallest resemblance to anything
else found in Greece, but they have some similitude to the Persepolitan style
of sculpture. (Leake, Morea, vol. ii. p. 374.) There are remains of a second subterraneous
building near the Gate of Lions (Plan, D); and those of the two others are lower
down the hill towards the west.
There has been considerable discussion among modern scholars respecting
the purpose of those subterraneous buildings. The statement of Pausanias, that
they were the treasuries of the Atreidae, was generally accepted, till Mure published
an essay in the Rheinisches Museum for 1839 (vol. vi. p. 240), in which he endeavoured
to establish that all such buildings were the family vaults of the ancient heroes
by whom they were construeted. In the great edifice at Mycenae he supposes the
inner apartment to have been the burial-place, and the outer vault the heroum
or sanctuary of the deceased. This opinion has been adopted by most modern scholars,
but has been combated by Leake, who adheres to the ancient doctrine. (Peloponnesiaca,
p. 256.) The two opinions may, however, be to some extent reconciled by supposing
that the inner chamber was the burial-place, and that the outer contained the
arms, jewels, and other ornaments most prized by the deceased. It was the practice
among the Greeks in all ages for the dead to carry with them to their tombs a
portion of their property; and in the heroic ages the burial-places of the powerful
rulers of Mycenae may have been adorned with such splendour that the name of Treasuries
was given to their tombs. There is, indeed, good reason for believing, from the
remains of brazen nails found in the large chamber of the Treasury of Atreus,
that the interior surface of the chamber was covered with brazen plates.
At the foot of the lower town stands the modern village of Kharvati.
This text is from: Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (1854) (ed. William Smith, LLD). Cited June 2004 from The Perseus Project URL below, which contains interesting hyperlinks
Mycenae and Mycene (Mukenai, Mukene). A city at the head of
the plain of Argolis, reputed in Greek tradition to have been the residence of
Agamemnon. Its most flourishing period probably fell within the latter half of
the second thousand years before Christ. At that time the seat of wealthy and
powerful chieftains, it subsequently fell under the power of Argos, and was during
the historical period a place of no importance. The wall of the citadel and several
"bee-hive" tombs have always been visible. Excavations, carried on by
Schliemann in 1876, and later by the Greek Arch?ological Society, have enormously
increased our knowledge of Mycenae and of the early civilization which it represents.
The first illustration shows in the middle distance the acropolis
of Mycenae, with a portion of its encompassing wall. This wall, for the most part,
resembles in its construction that of Tiryns, though the blocks are not so gigantic.
In places, however, we find an outer facing of approximately regular ashlar masonry;
in other places, of carefully jointed polygonal work. The principal entrance,
the socalled Lion Gate, is shown in the third illustration. It consists of two
upright posts surmounted by an enormous flat lintel. The relieving triangle above
the lintel is filled by a relief representing two lions (or lionesses) facing
one another, and having between them an object of doubtful interpretation. There
is, in addition, a smaller gate on the north side of the citadel.
Within the Lion Gate is a circular enclosure, nearly ninety
feet in diameter. This was formed by two concentric rows of upright slabs, the
space between the two rows being covered by horizontal slabs. Within the enclosure
are six rectangular graves of various sizes, sunk in the rock at various depths
below the double ring of slabs. The graves when opened contained the remains of
from one to five corpses each (buried unburned), or nineteen in all, together
with gold masks and ornaments, vessels of gold and of bronze, bronze weapons,
pottery of the so-called Mycenae type, etc. Above the graves (in precisely what
positions it is now difficult to make out) stood a number of grave-stones, partly
unsculptured, partly sculptured with rude reliefs.
At the summit of the acropolis remains of a palace, similar
in plan to that of Tiryns, but less well preserved, were discovered in 1886 by
the Greek Archaeological Society. The great megaron or hall, with its circular
hearth surrounded by four pillars and its double vestibule, is easily recognizable.
Above the palace, and partly upon its ruins, are remains of what is thought to
have been an early Doric temple.
Outside the acropolis was the city, consisting apparently of
several detached settlements. In this region eight large subterranean buildings,
doubtless tombs, of bee-hive form, are known to exist. The most imposing of these
is the so-called "Treasury of Atreus" or "Tomb of Agamemnon,"of
which a vertical section is shown on p. 452. It is approached by a passage-way
or dromos, walled at the sides, but open above. Then comes the doorway, once closed
by heavy doors. The principal inner chamber is about fifty feet in diameter at
the bottom and the same in height. It is built of great stones, laid in horizontal
courses, each course pushed a little farther inward than the one below; compare
the construction of the relieving triangle over the Lion Gate. There is, besides,
a smaller side-chamber, cut in the rock. The other seven beehive tombs are built
in a similar fashion, but with smaller stones. In addition to these, upwards of
sixty smaller tomb-chambers, excavated in the solid rock and approached likewise
by dromoi, have been discovered and opened.
The prehistoric civilization to which the Mycenaean remains
bear witness must have been, in comparison with what meets us at the dawn of the
historical period in Greece, a brilliant one. That it was powerfully influenced
by the earlier civilizations of the East, and especially by that of Egypt, there
is abundant evidence to show. But the whole subject of its relations to what went
before and what came after is in too uncertain a state to be treated in a sketch
like the present.
This text is cited Sep 2002 from The Perseus Project URL below, which contains interesting hyperlinks
Located in the NE corner of the region, some 135 km SW of Athens, it experienced its greatest period of prosperity in the Late Bronze Age. In the Geometric period only a few people had their small houses on the summit of its acropolis. Conditions improved in the archaic period (ca. 650-500 B.C.) when a temple was built on the summit and on a terrace whose retaining wall is preserved. Of the temple, only a part of the E wall and fragments of sculptured metopes survive. The Mycenaeans fought at Thermopylai and Plataia, but ca. 468 B.C. their acropolis was destroyed by the Argives, who after 300 B.C. transformed it into a township. The fortification walls were then repaired in the polygonal style of masonry, samples of which can be seen by the Lion Gate. The acropolis itself was filled with buildings, now preserved in scattered fragments, and a large temple constructed on the summit was dedicated either to Hera or Athena. The foundations and part of the floor of the temple survive. Below the acropolis, a lower city was surrounded by fortification walls, fragments of which exist along the N periphery. In the lower city remains of a fountain built in poros stone near the Lion Gate and a theater constructed across the dromos of the Tomb of Klytemnestra date from this period of reoccupation. Of the theater only a few seats can be seen today. A small number of graves and fragments of lamps prove that the site was sparsely inhabited to the end of the 3d c. A.D.
G. E. Mylonas, ed.
This text is from: The Princeton encyclopedia of classical sites,
Princeton University Press 1976. Cited Nov 2002 from
Perseus Project URL below, which contains 54 image(s), bibliography & interesting hyperlinks.
Λάβετε το καθημερινό newsletter με τα πιο σημαντικά νέα της τουριστικής βιομηχανίας.
Εγγραφείτε τώρα!
